One Race to Go
September
ended with The Bush School the odds-on favorite to capture both
the boys and girls league and district titles in Cross country.
But injuries (and a defection to soccer by Bush star Duncan
Clark) evened the odds in the Emerald City League. Even more
significantly, BCS junior Andrew Van Ness, the #2 runner for BCS
until this month, took a full minute off his 5K time and
catapulted the BCS boys to the top of the league.
On their
home course at Kelsey Creek Park on October 2nd,
Nathanael placed 3rd and Andrew finished 5th
out of 77 runners. At the Lakewood Hole-in-the-Wall
Invitational on October 6th, it was Andrew who beat
Nathanael. Against District 4 teams at Millersylvania State
Park on October 9th, (where Nathanael had finished 1st
in 2006), again they were Nate 3rd and Andrew 5th.
At the
league championships at Lower Woodland Park (in a drenching
deluge) it was Andrew 3rd and Nate 4th –
leading the BCS boys team to the Emerald City League championship! 1. BCS
(51), 2. U Prep (63), 3. Bush (70), 4. SAAS (91), 5.
Northwest (106), 6. Overlake (150), 7. Cedar Park Christian
(164) (The BCS girls team took 3rd place.)
The
District 2 championships back at Kelsey Creek Park earned BCS
another trip to State as they capped their season locally with
another victory – with Andrew running and impressive 2nd
(where Nate was last year) and Nathanael taking 5th.
1. Bellevue Christian (54), 2. Bush (62), 3.
University Prep (68), 4. Northwest (94), 5. Seattle Academy
(97), 6. Cedar Park Christian (146), 7. Overlake (162). It was
interesting that only BCS finished in the same position in both
championship races. (Again the BCS girls took 3rd.)
When he’s
rested Nathanael is at his very best. He has his last and
biggest Cross Country race yet in Pasco on Saturday, November 3rd.
Alas,
Jeannie Beth will not be moving on to run at Pasco. In her
final race she moved back into 2nd place on the BCS
girls varsity team but would have needed to be about one minute
faster over the 3.1 mile course in order to make the top ten
that earned State spots. But she learned to run and will be a
force to reckon with next season. |
SBE Sponsors CBFA National Conference
On October 4th through 6th the SPU School of Business and
Economics hosted over 250 Christian business faculty members
at the annual Christian Business Faculty Conference.
I had a big role behind the scenes. I was in charge of
preparing reports from the online registration database on
everything from who still needed to pay to who had food
allergies! I was also responsible for nametags, CEU
certificates, the
conference website which I designed, and much more.
Above
left, our dean Jeff Van Duzer spoke about the "Purpose of
Business" from God's perspective at a Thursday pre-conference
session. I also served as the official conference
photographer (with my new Nikkor lens!) On the down side I
also was the guy who met the busses at the hotels downtown on
Thursday and Friday mornings, meaning I had to get up at 5:00AM
to catch the early bus from Bellevue.
I
did manage to get a date out of the deal. I took Nancy to
hobnob at the Thursday night welcome event at the Seattle
Aquarium. That is one cool place where I would like to
spend more time. I was so busy eating fancy cheeses and
pretending I was a business professor that I didn't get enough
time with the fish. I was reminded of my old aquarium
hobby when I had over 200 gallons of fish tanks in my last
bachelor apartment. I think this is a better way to watch
fish.
|
Watch Out! You Might Get What You Pray For
When I pray
I expect an answer. That answer might be “No!” or it might be
“wait”, or (if/since the Spirit was prompting the prayer anyway)
it’s likely to be “Go for it!”
Well, I’ve
often felt I needed to be teaching. After taking a “gifts
class” at First Presbyterian Church of Bellevue in the
mid-1990’s I was even more convinced. In 1999 that prompted me
to “seek wise counsel” with a long session with friend and
Pastor Jim Berkley (see
http://jimberkley.blogspot.com/) . We
agreed that if the university offered me an opportunity to teach
there, I should take it. This I did from 2000 until this year.
But that opportunity has come to an end.
Earlier in
October I was (for the nth time) debating the seminary
issue with myself. I reached Conclusion #1: What is a Ph.D. if
not sufficient evidence that one is capable of independent study
and research? What could I learn in a seminary that I could not
learn in equivalent time spent with my considerable library?
Then
Sunday, October 28th, Rev. Earl Palmer, offered a
very brief sermon on John 7:37-39. Alas, he made a particular
error in his presentation. Dr. Palmer stated that Jesus only
arrived for this final day of the Feast, when in fact Jesus
clearly arrived “halfway through the Feast” (John 7:14a). And
there was my answer to a prayer!
At the
outset of the service that morning I had set the teaching
question before God. The day before, I had led the Saturday
Men’s Bible Study through Ephesians 4:7-16, including “11
It was he who gave some to be . . . teachers,
12 to prepare God's people for works of
service,” Although there was little
discussion of “teacher” on Saturday, the question was still on
my heart on Sunday. I took up the pew Bible and turned to John
7. Context! What was the context of the sound bite sized
passage Dr. Palmer was discussing? And in that search I “heard”
God’s clear answer.
14 But
when it was now the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the
temple, and began to teach. 15 The Jews therefore were
marveling, saying, "How has this man become learned, having
never been educated?" 16 Jesus therefore answered them, and
said, "My teaching is not Mine, but His who sent Me. 17 "If any
man is willing to do His will, he shall know of the teaching,
whether it is of God, or whether I speak from Myself. 18 "He who
speaks from himself seeks his own glory; but He who is seeking
the glory of the One who sent Him, He is true, and there is no
unrighteousness in Him. John 7:14-18 NASB
And this is
how I understood the answer to my question: “having never been
educated” -- (a seminary credential is irrelevant when weighed
against a specific gifting from God.) And “He who is seeking
the glory of the One who sent Him, He is true, and there is no
unrighteousness in Him” speaks to the desire to teach to be a
response to Another’s call and not a self-chosen path.
A final
surprise awaited me on Monday. I had packed two books to read
(putting aside an interesting yet unfinished book, Longitude
by Dava Sobel.) The larger was Edersheim’s The Life and
Times of Jesus the Messiah. The smaller was a translation
into English of a Catholic volume on a similar theme, Daily
Life in the Times of Jesus by Henri Daniel-Rops. The
translator was Patrick O’Brian (the pen name of Englishman
Richard Patrick Russ). This tie-in with my favorite author was
a delightful surprise. I, however, will read Edersheim.
The Daniel-Rops text proved to be so influenced by
extra-biblical Roman Catholic tradition and legend that it
disqualified itself, in my judgment, as an honest piece of
Christian scholarship.
Bits and Pieces
- "Don't quit your day job, Dad.
I need the tuition discount." ― Nathanael
(When I talk of going to seminary.)
- "Before there was eHarmony.com,
there was Mom." ― Dick, in reference to
Grandma Jean.
-
I visited my mom and dad
twice toward the end of the month and remarked how much mom
looks like her mom. I had fun asking her questions.
She knew she had four children and nine grandchildren. She
could not come up with all of the names of the grandchildren,
not remembering Katherine and Debbie. We are hoping to
have her over here for at least a week before Christmas. Dad had a serious series of
bloody noses. He will see his doctor on November 5th.
-
Randy was the speaker at the
annual P.E.O. "BIL Dinner" this year. I helped prepare his
PowerPoint and introduced him. He gave an
interesting talk on water, mostly of the Seattle/Puget Sound
region.
Quote from September
(My colleagues across SPU are a wise bunch, more often than
not.)
“Humble science” is the
joyful kind that actually likes to find that
a theory is wrong if that improves our
knowledge and wonder and leads to new
discoveries. (And that is, after all, the
paradigm for “science” that we’re taught!)
“Humble faith” is open faith that never
assumes to fully categorize God (or tell God
how God must create!), that is founded in
love and trust. Humble faith allows the joy
of humble science to thrive, and actually
helps maintain that joy in the face of
opposition from vested interests in both
science and religion. If humble faith and
humble science seem to conflict, the
“humble” part in both remains open for new
understandings to emerge – as I have found
they do, not only in the science, but also
in the understandings of faith. I think a
case may be made that this approach to
science and faith strengthens both rather
than weakening or destroying one or the
other.
Dr. Doug
Durasoff, Professor of Political Science
From an SPU !Facnet email, 9/24/07
|